<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: PyOAE renamed DjOAE</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.tfd.co.uk/2012/05/02/pyoae-renamed-djoae/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.tfd.co.uk/2012/05/02/pyoae-renamed-djoae/</link>
	<description>Open Source Open Thought</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2013 05:22:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian</title>
		<link>http://blog.tfd.co.uk/2012/05/02/pyoae-renamed-djoae/#comment-1435</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ian]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 May 2012 10:40:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.tfd.co.uk/?p=621#comment-1435</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am using simplejson with custom encoders to produce the Json, manly because its quick and uses C code when it can. Those are wired in using standaard DJango views, nothing special. I thought about using Piston, but found simplejson, encoders and views simple and easy so I never got to trying it. I am generally not doing any error logging, so I use the standard logging API and when I have everything in an area working I remove all the routine logging so that all that appears in the log file is 1 line per request. That seems to be quite effective in avoiding loads of lines in the log files. I&#039;ll have a look at Sentry though it looks usefull, as does the &lt;a href=&quot;http://instagram-engineering.tumblr.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Engineering blog&lt;/a&gt; at Instagram, where they run 100+ DJango instances on EC2 using a PostgreSQL + REDIS backend. Interestingly they have chosen Solr rather than Elastic Search for their search backend.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am using simplejson with custom encoders to produce the Json, manly because its quick and uses C code when it can. Those are wired in using standaard DJango views, nothing special. I thought about using Piston, but found simplejson, encoders and views simple and easy so I never got to trying it. I am generally not doing any error logging, so I use the standard logging API and when I have everything in an area working I remove all the routine logging so that all that appears in the log file is 1 line per request. That seems to be quite effective in avoiding loads of lines in the log files. I&#8217;ll have a look at Sentry though it looks usefull, as does the <a href="http://instagram-engineering.tumblr.com/" rel="nofollow">Engineering blog</a> at Instagram, where they run 100+ DJango instances on EC2 using a PostgreSQL + REDIS backend. Interestingly they have chosen Solr rather than Elastic Search for their search backend.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gaeremyncks</title>
		<link>http://blog.tfd.co.uk/2012/05/02/pyoae-renamed-djoae/#comment-1434</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[gaeremyncks]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 May 2012 08:58:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.tfd.co.uk/?p=621#comment-1434</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Is there any chance of making the repository public?

I&#039;m currently working on a Django backed app and we&#039;re using Piston for our CRUD-typed APIs. I&#039;d be interested to see what you&#039;re using? I have a feeling we might get away with just using plain Django views.

Did you have a look at Sentry for doing error logging? We&#039;ve recently enabled this and it&#039;s 10 times better than digging through enormous amount of log files.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is there any chance of making the repository public?</p>
<p>I&#8217;m currently working on a Django backed app and we&#8217;re using Piston for our CRUD-typed APIs. I&#8217;d be interested to see what you&#8217;re using? I have a feeling we might get away with just using plain Django views.</p>
<p>Did you have a look at Sentry for doing error logging? We&#8217;ve recently enabled this and it&#8217;s 10 times better than digging through enormous amount of log files.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charles Severance</title>
		<link>http://blog.tfd.co.uk/2012/05/02/pyoae-renamed-djoae/#comment-1427</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Charles Severance]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2012 04:21:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.tfd.co.uk/?p=621#comment-1427</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is cool because Django is the framework used by Google App Engine (with special Google tweaks).  Since 2009, I have taught roughly 550 University of Michigan graduate students AppEngine and so they know wgsi, templates, models, etc.   I chose App Engine/Django because I felt it was the single most complete and approachable full-stack web framework and we teach Python programming in the previous course.   The students love it.  

While I am not sure how may super-scalable apps run *on* the Google infrastructure, Google sure has made Django far more popular.  I think lots of folks cut their teeth on App Engine for free (buying my awesome O&#039;Reilly book) and then when they want to go large-scale - move to Django.  My Appengine Book has a web site at www.appenginelearn.com and my Python book is at www.py4inf.com.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is cool because Django is the framework used by Google App Engine (with special Google tweaks).  Since 2009, I have taught roughly 550 University of Michigan graduate students AppEngine and so they know wgsi, templates, models, etc.   I chose App Engine/Django because I felt it was the single most complete and approachable full-stack web framework and we teach Python programming in the previous course.   The students love it.  </p>
<p>While I am not sure how may super-scalable apps run *on* the Google infrastructure, Google sure has made Django far more popular.  I think lots of folks cut their teeth on App Engine for free (buying my awesome O&#8217;Reilly book) and then when they want to go large-scale &#8211; move to Django.  My Appengine Book has a web site at <a href="http://www.appenginelearn.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.appenginelearn.com</a> and my Python book is at <a href="http://www.py4inf.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.py4inf.com</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
